Home | Headlines | Annex Bulletins | Index 2004 | About Founder | SearchFeedbackClips | Activism | Client quotes | Workshop | Columns | Subscribe

The copyright-protected information contained in the ANNEX BULLETINS and ANNEX NEWSFLASHES is part of the Comprehensive Market Service (CMS).  It is intended for the exclusive use by those who have contracted for the entire CMS service.

Excerpts from the Confidential Client Edition

Annex clients click here


Analysis of Computer Science Corp. Third Quarter FY04 Business Results

Good Quarter Gets Boos

Strong New Contract Sales, Weak U.S. Commercial Revenues

PHOENIX, February 13 – Computer Science Corp.’s (CSC) executives should empathize with Rodney Dangerfield.  Wall Street showed no respect for CSC following the release of its third quarter of fiscal year 2004 results (Feb 11).  CSC shares dropped by more than 8% on Thursday and Friday despite a good quarterly report.  Adding insult to injury, the humiliation happened the day the Dow and most of CSC competitors’ shares thrived.

The reason?  Who knows...  CSC’s latest earnings basically met analyst expectations, while the revenues surged by 30%, boosted by last year’s DynCorp acquisition and by foreign currency translations. 

The best news, however, was the new contract sales.  They more than tripled in the latest quarter, from $1.8 billion a year ago, to $6.0 billion.  That’s a new all-time record for a single quarter.


Slowing Commercial Revenues

If there was a fly in CSC’s third quarter ointment, it was the U.S. commercial revenues.  While the U.S. government business has been booming (up 30% in the quarter), the U.S. commercial revenues were down 5%.  As a result, CSC’s global commercial revenues also declined 1% in constant currency (they were up 8% as reported).


No. 10 “Death Merchant”

In short, CSC has done a complete turn-about-face since 9/11.The company is now the 10th-largest Pentagon supplier, a big jump from the No. 21 position before the DynCorp acquisition.

Besides CSC (#10), EDS (#27), Dell (#35) and IBM (#50) are among the Top 50 U.S. “death merchants,” based on the Pentagon spending report for 2003 (see the Pentagon Top 50 table)

Just in case you may be wondering if the 213% increase in CSC’s revenues from the Pentagon tops the top 50 list, it doesn’t.  That dubious honor goes to vice president Dick Cheney’s former company – Halliburton.  Despite the controversy over its over-charging the Pentagon for some of its oil deliveries in Iraq, this company recorded a whopping 711% jump in 2003 revenues. 


The “Not-So-Free” Cash Flow

Meanwhile, back to CSC’s latest quarter, free cash flow, or lack thereof, is a legitimate reason for Wall Street’s worrying about the financial performance.  During the first nine months of the current fiscal year, the free cash flow was a negative $173 million, more than double the corresponding amount a year ago ($85 million).  As a result, CSC’s cash on hand dropped by over 50%, from $300 million as of March 28, 2003, to $148 million as of Jan 2, 2004.


Summary and Outlook

On balance, there seem to be at least as many reasons to cheer the latest CSC report card, as there are to pan them.  Surging sales are bound to translate into growing revenues and profits in the future.  Yet Wall Street has chosen to ignore the good and boo the bad.

As a result, CSC’s devalued stock price, even if it is still within 10% of its 52-week high, appears a relative bargain compared to its major rivals (see the table).

That’s especially evident in terms of the Price/Earnings Growth (PEG) ratio, a forward-looking statistics measuring a stock’s valuation against its projected growth rate (calculated as a P/E Ratio divided by the 5-year expected growth rate).

The PEG Ratio makes the CSC stock look like the best bargain, followed by Accenture, IBM and EDS, in that order.  So anyone still booing CSC may be missing a good play in a global wartime economy.

"That's all she wrote," we're afraid, for those of you who are NOT Annex Research clients, and who are now reading the complete Annex Bulletin (10 pages in print edition), along with all charts which back up our story.

Qualified media and friends of Annex may request a TEMPORARY User ID and Password by clicking here and explaining why they wish to have access to this particular Annex Bulletin.  Or call Bob Djurdjevic at 602-824-8111 (cell) to promise not to copy it or otherwise republish it.

To find our how you can become one of our clients, and read the rest of this and other Annex Bulletins, click on . Thank you.

Annex clients click here

Happy bargain hunting!

Bob Djurdjevic

For additional Annex Research reports on EDS, check out... 

2004: "Good Quarter Gets Boos" (Feb 2004); "Hot Air Jordan" Flaunts Flop as Feat (Feb 2004); "Cronyism Is Alive and Well at EDS" (Jan 2004);  "Five Most and Least Likely Forecasts for 2004" (Jan 2004)

2003 CSC:  "Less Than Meets the Eye" (May 16), "Back to the Future" (Feb 5)

2002 CSC:  Analysis of CSC FY02 results (May 17, 2002), "A Disastrous Quarter!" (Apr 17, 2002), “Tough Times, Soft Deals,” (Apr 25, 2002)

A selection from prior years: Analysis of CSC calendar 2000 results (Mar 26, 2000), CSC's FY2000 Business Results (May 10, 2000), Business Is Humming Nicely (Nov 3, 2000),  CSC 3Q2K, CIO Survey (Feb. 29, 2000), CSC: A Mouse That Roars? (Nov 1998)

Or just click on and use "financial engineering" or similar  keywords.

Volume XX, Annex Bulletin 2004-05
February 13, 2004

Bob Djurdjevic, Editor
(c) Copyright 2004 by Annex Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
e-mail: annex@djurdjevic.com

P.O. Box 97100, Phoenix, Arizona 85060-7100
TEL/FAX: (602) 824-8111

Home | Headlines | Annex Bulletins | Index 2004 | About Founder | SearchFeedbackClips | Activism | Client quotes | Workshop | Columns | Subscribe