%@ LANGUAGE=VBScript %> <% Set asplObj=Server.CreateObject("ASPL.Login") asplObj.Protect Set asplObj=Nothing %>
|
Annex Bulletin 2009-20 October 16, 2009A partially OPEN edition |
Obama's Don Quixote Swings, Misses (Analysis of DoJ's latest antitrust action against IBM)
A Rally of Hope over Fact (Analysis of Top IT cos' latest market and business performances) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
IBM FINANCIAL |
|
||
Updated 10/16/09, 12:00PM HITAnalysis of IBM's Third Quarter Business ResultsIBM Stock Takes a Beating... Despite Better-than-expected Quarterly Results; When Reason Takes a Holiday on Wall StreetHAIKU, Maui, Oct 16 – IBM stock took a beating today, dropping over six points or five percent to close at $121.30. When the company released its third quarter results last night, both earnings and revenues were better-than-expected. Free cash flow set a new record. Revenues increased sequentially. The IBM CFO said in a conference with analysts that revenues would actually grow year-over-year in the fourth quarter as well. As a result, Big Blue raised its full year earnings-per-share forecast from $9.70 to $9.85. No wonder most headlines lauded the IBM results (see below).
Yet investors shrugged off the facts and sold off the stock anyway (see the chart). Which is what happens on Wall Street every now and then when reason takes a holiday and emotion takes over. "We expected them to exceed expectations on both numbers" (earnings and revenues), is how one analyst tried to "explain" the inexplicable (see CNBC, Oct 15). "Expected them to exceed expectations?" In other words, IBM is to be judged by Wall Street's wishful thinking not by their published estimates? If so, what are Wall Street estimates for if they really do not represent what analysts really think? A fig leaf for incompetence? Which is why we prefer to stick to facts. So here's what we told our clients shooting from the hip, right after the IBM results were released last night:
So there you have it... our précis of Big Blue's latest results, based on FACTS. You can contrast that with the way Wall Street reacted to them. And now some more details... Business Segment Analysis IBM third quarter revenues
declined 7% (down 5% in constant currency), but were up sequentially from
the second quarter, as we noted earlier.
Geographies.
Americas’ revenues were $9.9
billion, a decrease of 5% (down 4% in constant currency). Europe
dropped 12% to $7.8 billion (down 6% in constant currency). Asia/Pacific
revenues were essentially Revenues from the company’s growth markets organization also decreased 6% (1% in constant currency), and represented 19% share of the total of geographic revenues. But they outpaced the more mature IBM market by five growth points, with China's revenues surging 26%.
Industries.
IBM's government sector was the best
performer in the third quarter, with flat revenues as reported (up 2% in
constant currency). Financial services wa Services. As goes services, so goes Big Blue these days. IBM Global Services revenues declined 7% (down 5% in constant currency), the same rates of change as IBM's as a whole. New contract signings dropped by the same amount.
Someone Wall Street t So those who blamed the contract signings for IBM's alleged "woes" only managed to show their ignorance of how a services business works. Furthermore, the CFO Mark Loughridge said during the post-release teleconference with analysts that IBM signed three deals in the first two days of October with a total value of nearly $1 billion. "These three deals would have pushed our outsourcing growth rate to 16% at constant currency, which is consistent with the first half performance of 18% growth," he said. He added that, "with a solid start to the quarter and looking at the pipeline of deals we have, we should be able to grow outsourcing signings double-digits in the fourth quarter." Even without those mega deals, IBM's outsourcing signings grew 1% in the third quarter. So if IBM services had a weakness, it was in the consulting and systems integration business.
Software.
Revenues from the
software segment were $5.1 billion, a decrease of 3% (flat, adjusting for
currency). But IBM’s key middleware products, which
include WebSphere, Information Management, Tivoli, Lotus and Rational
products, grew by 2% to $2.9 billion (up 5% in constant currency).
Operating systems revenues of $521 million decreased 12% (down 8%, adjusting
for curr IBM said it gained market share in WebSphere, Information Management, Tivoli and Rational software during the third quarter. But the most distinguishing feature of IBM's software is its high profitability. At 86% gross margin, it is by far the company's most profitable segment. And as you could see from the pretax profit chart above, the software contributes more dollars to Big Blue's bottom line than any other business segment, including the bigger services operations.
Hardware.
Revenues from the
Systems and Technology segment totaled $3.9 billion for the quarter, down
12% (11% in constant currency). But that rate of decline repre Revenues from System z mainframe server products decreased 26%. System p dropped 10%, System x rose 1%, while storage dropped 13%. Revenues from Microelectronics OEM decreased 1%. IBM said it gained market share in System p, System x and disk and tape storage during the third quarter despite shrinking revenues. Meaning, it was winning business from its direct competitors whose revenues declined even more. Summary It is impossible to interpret emotional decisions using rational arguments. There is no way, therefore, to explain Wall Street's negative reaction to IBM's solid third quarter results. So the only thing left to say by way of a summary is that IBM shares are today even more undervalued than they were over a week ago when we restated our assessment that they were undervalued (see A Rally of Hope over Fact, Oct 5). Which would make them an even better buying opportunity for the investors who are willing to bet that the current rally of hope over fact will continue. In other words, having depending on reason and logic seems detrimental in this type of a market. What happened to the IBM stock in the last 24 hours underlines that in spades.
Bob Djurdjevic
Or just click on SEARCH and use "company or topic name" keywords.
Home | Headlines | Annex Bulletins | Index 1993-2009 | Special Reports | About Founder | Search | Feedback | Clips | Activism | Client quotes | Speeches | Columns | Subscribe |
A Fading Star (Analysis of Accenture's 4Q09 business results)
Tempest in a Tea Pot (Analysis of latest IT services industry M&A's)
Less Than Meets the Eye - Analysis of HP's 3QFY09 results
Big Blue Blows Lid Off Forecasts - Analysis of IBM's 2Q09 results
Apple, Google Lead Comeback - Analysis of Top IT Cos' stock & business performances
Revenues, Earnings Drop - Analysis of Accenture's 3QFY09 business results
IBM Wins the "Gold" - Analysis of IT Services Octathlon 2009 results
Suddenly, All Lines Point South - Analysis of HP's 2Q09 business results
Back on Growth Track - Analysis of IBM Global Services 2008 results Sometimes Less Is More and Down Is Up - Analysis of IBM's 1Q business results IBM's Holistic Approach - Treating businesses like living organisms - secret of success IBM Tries to Pull Dow, HP Up - Big Blue stock up sharply after CFO remarks at investor conf Hurd's First Stumble - HP's 1Q09 revenues, earnings disappoint Wall Street Two Thumbs Up for Big Blue - Analysis of IBM 4Q08 business results
Big Blue: All Heart - IBM creating new jobs in American Heartland When You Catch a Tiger by the Tail... - An editorial about greed & success Squeezing the Consumer Dry (Greed fueled both bankers & oilmen's try to squeeze blood out of stone - consumer) The Year of Living Dangerously - Analysis of global investment trends
|