Updated
10/12/07, 4:00PM PDT
Update to Our 2007 "State of the IBM Union" Analysis
Seedlings Sprouting Stronger Limbs
Innovation Drives Growth; Server
Brand Convergence Leads to New Sales & Marketing Model
Big "Green" Initiative Played
Right into Our 2006 Garden Analogy
SCOTTSDALE, Oct 12 - Nearly one year ago,
we first noted that "From
Little Acorns Mighty Oaks Grow" (see right image). The report
was a part of our fall 2006 analysis of the "State of the IBM Union" and
Big Blue's growth prospects. And we concluded back then that, "as
more Wall Street investors turn their eyes from feeds and speeds to
weeds and seeds, more will recognize the growth
potential of the new seedlings in the Big Blue garden. As they do,
the IBM stock will break out of its multi-year slump and surpass that
two-year record."

Well, the IBM stock has certainly done that. It closed
yesterday (Oct 10) at $118.32, up 41% from a year ago, but still a little
short of our $125-target price, that we also set last fall. In the
process, the Big Blue shares have also outperformed the Dow, of which they
are a part, by more than double the rate of growth (see left chart).
Since that time, IBM's "green" initiative (see "The
Greening of Big Blue", May 2007 and "The Greening
of Big Blue, Part 2," Aug 2007) has played right into our garden
analogy from last fall. All we needed to do is change the color of the
IBM logo from blue to green. Here's an excerpt:
It used to be a business of
speeds and feeds. Now it's
more about weeds and seeds. Running a successful IT business these
days is not unlike caring for a beautiful garden. It takes a lot of TLC
(tender loving care) and creativity. And back-breaking work...
planting the seeds for future growth; nurturing them to seedlings; weeding
and pruning the excess, thus shaping the design into a "constant
gardener's" vision of beauty.
Sometimes, it can be years before
results become discernible. Which
takes patience and perseverance. Both are in short supply on Wall
Street. But "from little acorns mighty oaks grow."
Small seeds sprout into pretty seedlings.
As Sam Palmisano's new Big Blue garden is starting to take shape, Wall
Street is (finally) taking notice of some seedlings that have grown from
seeds planted years ago.
(An excerpt
from Annex Bulletin
2006-41, Nov 2007)
So how are the "Big Green" seedlings doing a year later?
Are there any new ones that have sprouted since that time? Here's our
update to last year's fall "State of the Union" analysis...
IBM
"State of the Union" Update
With IBM expected to report its third quarter results next
week, we can only use the first half results as the latest indicators.
And they were good... very good, in fact. Second quarter revenues
were up 9% to $23.8 billion, with IBM's biggest and most profitable
business segments growing in double digits. Earnings per share
grew even faster, rising 15% from a year ago.
Wall Street also liked it, pushing the
IBM shares to about $115 (see "IBM Beats the Street,"
July 2007). That was only three points below the current
near-record level, but quite a bit above the August chasm caused by the
turbulence in financial cre dit markets. The crisis dragged down most
IT stocks, including IBM's, but did not keep them down, as the subsequent
rally lifted the Big Blue shares to nearly a six-year high ($120, set on Oct
2).
We had a chance to look more closely into the Big Green
garden last week at an IBM Systems and Technology Group (STG) conference in
Stamford, CT. And what we saw was some last year's seedlings getting
stronger and sprouting new limbs, and some new ones also jutting out of the
mighty oak (right chart).
New
"Go-to-Market" Approach.
One of them was a new "go-to-market"
approach, "a change from a brand-centric to a customer-centric format,"
according to Bill Zeitler (right), who heads up the STG, the $22 billion IBM
unit that encompasses all of its hardware businesses.
"It's the most significant change in 15 years," echoed Bob Samson, the head
of IBM's worldwide hardware sales whose job it was and is to implement the
new marketing approach (below left).
He said the company first tested its new sales model in China, and the
results were "significantly better" than before.
That's not surprising. It's hard to image how you can lose if you put
your customer first. Perhaps the on ly question is what took IBM so
long?
We can recall, for example, the former IBM CEO (twice removed), John Akers,
declaring 1987 to be "the year of the customer." Which in turn gave
DEC, then the main IBM challenger, a chance to mock Big Blue's sales tactics
by running ads saying, "at DEC, every year is the year of the customer" (see
Annex Bulletin 87-31, May 1987, and "Akers:
The Last Emperor," June 1991).
Samson seemed to anticipate such skepticism by asking the rhetorical
question himself. He answered it by saying that, as the growth
emphasis shifted this year to the SMB and market-specific solutions markets,
and a brand consolidation got underway, it became necessary to change the
IBM sales model to reflect the new market realities.

And so the preceding is our graphical presentation of the
latest IBM seedling, its new three-pronged sales model. Underpinning
all three channels is innovation, some through collaboration with customers,
IBM executives said.
"You've got to be a foundry of innovation to help change the
world a little," said Samson.
His boss, Zeitler, said at the start of the two-day conference that he
had never seen more important technology innovations coming down the chute
as what IBM has in the pipeline for the next six months.
Server Brand Convergence. Furthermore, IBM can be
expected to converge of its
various server brands (x, i, p and z) into a unified "form factor" (box).
This process has already begun in the midmarket, with the merger of the
high-end of the System i and p server lines announced in late July.
Over time, other brands will foll ow
suit, including the high end of the the "p" and "z," though you should not
expect that in the near future.
The ultimate "form factor" in which IBM will deliver its "Big Blue in a
Box" solution to SMB and other customers is BladeCenter S (right).
Initially, it has the "i" and the "x" server blades. But eventually it
will include many others, including the new game blades (Cell
processors),
for example, and even competitors' blades (Dell, HP, etc.), according Marc
Dupaquier (left), the former software executive who took over the new IBM
SMB unit within STG in January of this year (see "IBM
Lowers Center of Gravity," Jan 2007).
And IBM will wrap its software and services around the Bladecenter S, as
well as the software of its select partners, and have the package sold at
the low end by existing partners as well as through some new channels, such
as telcos, for example. Dupaquier said IBM has already signed 194 of
348 most popular ISVs (Independent Software Vendors) whose software the "Big
Blue in a Box" will offer (right chart).

So with the server technological convergence, the old IBM brand-based
sales and marketing organization is becoming redundant and is being replaced
with a new three-pronged model, as Samson pointed out. So that's the
ultimate IBM answer to the "why now?"-question.
Large Enterprises. At the high end, for example, where IBM
has a 31% overall market share (41% in servers and 24% in storage),
according to Zeitler, IBM's challenged it so keep the growth going through
new initiatives, such as virtualization and IT optimization, and, of course,
the "greening of IBM" and of the
customer data centers.
Globalization is another driving force behind the resurging
mainframe demand, noted Jim Stallings (right), the head of the largest IBM
server product line. He cited several customer examples, including
Citigroup, for example, which bought 124 companies over the last several
years.
All that global churning and consolidation is good for IBM
mainframe business. The System z revenues were up for the fifth consecutive quarter, while the
overall MIPS shipments were up 45%, the eighth consecutive quarter
of growth, Stallings pointed out (also see "IBM Beats the
Street," July 18).

IBM se es
the overall systems market as a $95 billion per year opportunity, about 60%
of it in servers, and the rest in storage (left chart).
This is a market where power and cooling costs represent a significant
opportunity for savings. And IBM is leading the way by example.
As you you can see from the right chart as well as in "The Greening
of Big Blue, Part 2," (Aug 2007), IBM is going through a massive
consolidation of its IT resources that will result in annual savings of $1.5
billion, according to St eve
Sams, an IBM GTS (Global Technology Services) executive who is spearheading
the effort.
IBM spends about $500 million annually on energy, and its energy bill is
growing at 18% per year, Sams added.
"In most customer sites, we should be able to increase the energy
efficiency by 40% to 50%," he said. Yet "many clients are not (yet)
focuses on energy consumption issues," which is, of course, an opportunity
for a vendor like IBM that thinks it can hel p
customers with such problems.

IBM's chief hardware technology officer, Dr. Bernie Meyerson, said the
power and cooling expenses are growing 800% faster than the customers'
spending on servers (right and left charts). So the opportunity for
developers and customers to save goes well beyond the traditional ways of
scaling and compressing chips, a process that actually increases the heat
output.
Custom
Solutions. In what IBM calls the "custom and
embedded solutions" market, one of the new
seedlings we analyzed last year, a relatively new opportunity for IBM,
customers are spending about $92 billion per year on various engineering
services, customized systems and chips, according to IBM (right chart).
But since most of the customers consider their own R&D as one of their
"crown jewels," it has been tough for IBM to demonstrate why Big Blue
innovators can do better or more.
We s aid
last year that in many respects what Adalio Sanchez (left), the head of IBM
Global Engineering Services (GES), renamed earlier this year from TCS
(Technology Collaboration Services) and his team are trying to do is
reminiscent of the early days of IBM Global Services efforts to promote
outsourcing. Just like now with the R&D prospects, there were a lot of
skeptics among the customer CIOs of the late 1980s and early 1990s that
turning over their data centers to the likes of IBM or EDS or Accenture was
a smart thing to do. It took a few high-profile wins, like Eastman
Kodak or McDonnell Douglas to legitimize the new concept.
Well,
the GES team just got their first big milestone win - the Nokia Siemens
Network (NSN). And the key was the customer's perception that IBM
would empower and enhance its own R&D rather than displace it.
"In order to ensure our world-leading technology capabilities and optimum
synergies across the Business Lines, we have decided to strengthen our R&D
activities by creating a cost efficient R&D structure." said Jürgen Walter,
head of Service Core and Applications at NSN, in a release. "This move
provides Nokia Siemens Networks with the flexibility it needs to
successfully compete in the market,"
The deal was a part of the $2 billion cost-cutting directive that the
Siemens CEO Peter Loescher wants to take out of the NSN cost structure.
About 235 NSN engineers from labs in Munich and Berlin will transfer to IBM
under the agreement, Sanchez said.
Refusion of Arts & Sciences (revisited). Another IBM
deal in Europe underscored an old industry trend that we first identif ied
in 1994 - a refusion of arts and sciences that the silicon is facilitating.
When the sponsors of the Mare Nostrum data center, the #1 supercomputing
site in Europe, based in Barcelona, Spain, gave IBM the specs as to how they
wanted it built, they insisted it had to be "beautiful" as well as energy
efficient. And that's what they got eventually (right).
"It's the most beautiful site we've ever built," said IBM's Sams. He
should know a thing or two about that. Sams and his GTS team have
built about 60 new data centers so far, spending an average of only six to
eight weeks on each.
Retail Store Solutions. IBM's Retail Store Solutions
is perhaps one of the b est kept secrets inside
the Big Blue. It's what was left over from the PC sale to Lenovo in
2005. Yet it's one of the fastest growing businesses in IBM, and the
only one in which Big Blue actually
touches consumer markets directly.
Last year, for example, IBM's retail business grew by 21%, with its kiosk
revenues up over 70%, according to Steve Ladwig (left), who heads up this
unit. We estimate that this business will bring contribute $900
million to IBM revenues this year. And IBM has its point-of-sale
(POS) and other servers installed in 65 of the top 100 retailers, Ladwig said.
So Retail Store Solutions is another of Big Blue's seedlings whose growth
has been surprisingly strong.
But the real stunner for us was Ladwig's chart (right) that showed that
IBM is the largest POS provider in the business, with more than double the
installed base of the next two vendors combined (NCR and Fujitsu). And
that 94% of retail revenues still comes from the stores, not the web
purchases.
"There has been an unprecedented fragmentation of the consumer markets,"
he said. So now it takes targeting many more smaller segments for a
marketing campaign to work.
Ladwig said that about 40% of the IBM retail business comes from SMB,
where his unit now sells through about 2,000 partners now. And once
again, IBM's retail SMB delivery is based on the BladeCenter S.
"SMB is a big play for us," he added. "It's growing much faster
than the enterprise market."
SMB.
Speaking of SMB, that was one of the promising seedlings
identified in our last
year's "State of the IBM Union" report. And its importance seem to
rise this year when the IBM chairman and CEO said at the Partnerworld
conference in St. Louis in early may that this is the company's most
important growth opportunity (see "IBM:
Lowering Center of Gravity," May 2007).
Alas, its performance so far this year has not exactly lived up to that
promise. In the second quarter, for example, SMB revenues were $4.5
billion, up 7% in constant currency over the year before, only slightly
higher that the company's average growth of 6% in constant currency during
the same period.
Meanwhile, most of the SMB partners through which IBM sells with whom we
talked during our several 'round the world trips in the last year or so
are
growing at 20%, 30% or higher rates, as we also pointed out last year.
So clearly, IBM is not yet fully exploiting this growth opportunity.
Furthermore, IBM presenters at a "deep dive" session on SMB got an earful
from consultants and analysts about Big Blue's inconsistent definitions of
SMB market. In many countries, including the U.S., they often includes
some very large companies, only because Big Blue doesn't do much business
with them. That's also something we pointed out in our last year's
report on SMB. So we estimate that IBM's "true SMB" (companies with
1,000 employees or less) will be only about $11 billion in revenues this
year, or 12% of the total.

Which makes this Big Green seedling's growth still more in the "promised
land" category than today's reality. Nevertheless, "SMB is the place
to be," as we have been heralding for over 10 years now. And the
sooner IBM starts to act as an SMB vendor rather than try to retrofit its
large enterprise DNA and products into this entrepreneurial environment, the
faster its revenues and profits will grow.
Some Strategic Inconsistencies? When Sam Palmisano
said at the Bangalore June 2006 conference for financial analysts that the
company would "exit any busine ss
that is a commodity business," and that IBM would "not rationalize for
synergy" (as Lou Gerstner did by hanging on to the low margin PC business
for so long), we applauded the new IBM strategy. For, we saw it as a
statement about emphasizing "quality over quantity" (left chart). And
that's something that we saw as attractive both from the business
fundamentals, as well as stock market viewpoints.
Well, in checking out the various IBM product lines' strategies at the
STG Summit last week, we did come across some apparent inconsistencies in
the implementation of this IBM chairman's statement of direction.
At the System x breakout session, for example, we learned that the
second-largest IBM servers' hardware margins were not as good as that of
some of IBM's "traditional servers," according to Rich Hume, who heads up
the System x business. No surprise there, considering these servers
are based on Intel's chips.

We also learned that the low end of the System x product line accounts
for about half of its revenues, yet has margins that are considerably lower
than those at the high-end of the same product line. Now, that sure
smacked of a commodity-type business to us. So we asked Hume (right)
to explain this apparent inconsistency with IBM chairman's statement of
strategy.
He replied that, "you need the leverage of scale to be able to sustain
the high-end business." "Without the high volume (low end) servers,
the costs of high-end servers would be much higher."
The last time we checked, this type of an explanation would qualify as
cross-subsidization of products. Or "rationalization for synergy," as
Palmisano put it in Bangalore when he said that IBM would NOT engage in such
practices anymore.
"Customers demand that we deliver top-to-bottom servers," Hume summed it
up. And he said that there will be new "specialty form factors" in
2008-2009 in the low end that would help IBM differentiate itself more
(presumably leading to higher margins).
But when we asked him if that differentiation might also include some
"beautiful servers" at the low end, just like HP or Dell are now doing in
consumer markets, or the Mare Nostrum data centerexemplified a refusion of
arts and sciences (see above), Hume deferred the question to one of his
staffers who seemed clueless about what we were talking about.
Summary: Innovation, Innovation...
Innov ation,
innovation... and then more innovation. That was basically the theme
of Rod Adkins', STG's chief technology officer's (right) summary of IBM's
hardware strategy, as were the earlier presentations by Dr. Meyerson and
Zeitler. The three top IBM hardware executives marshaled out
numerous examples of where IBM's inventions, either in-house or in
collaboration with clients, helped change the world and the shape of the IT
industry.
Meyerson, for example, talked about IBM's "holistic" approach to
innovation that encompasses everything "from atoms to software."
Innovation at Big Blue these days is about "simultaneous optimization of
materials, devices, circuits, cores, chips, system architecture, system
assets and system software," and, of course, the new big "p" for power.
And it is the latter that is turning the IBM's famous blue into green.

Within that holistic approach, there are still pockets of excellence that
are carried out at the old "speeds and feeds" levels. Zeitler, for
example, showed the tremendous expansion of processing power by the Blue
Gene processors at the Argonne National Labs, soon to be dwarfed an order of
magnitude more powerful PERCS processor, based on Power 7, at DARPA (Defense
Advanced Project Research Agency - two above ch arts).
Adkins also pointed to "hybrid supercomputing" breakthroughs at Los
Alamos Labs, where x86, Linux master cluster and a Cell processor cluster
are targeting to deliver a 1.4 petaflop peak, 1.0 petaflop sustained
performance in project dubbed "Roadrunner" (right).


And so, the beat goes on... faster, smaller, cheaper, cooler is winning
the day again, but in a new way, for IBM and its customers.
Adkins saw the current period as the "virtualized" era, coming on the heels
of "distributed" and "centralized" periods during the first 50 years of the
computer industry (left chart). And the STG general managers, whom
Zeitler assembled on stage for discussion and a Q&A with analysts and
consultants put their own individual spins on the IBM innovation theme.

Overall, IBM seems to be churning out inventions at a rate that even Big
Green itself sometimes has trouble consuming, as evident from the IBM-Google
announcement this week of "cloud" computing (see "IBM-Google
on Cloud Nine?," Oct 2007). Enter the collaboration dimension of
innovation. Everybody is welcome to participate. All stand a
chance of benefiting from each other's creativity.
"You've got to be a foundry of innovation to help change the
world a little," as you saw earlier IBM's Samson declare.
Foundry and an art workshop as well. For, a refusion of arts of sciences is indeed taking place and taking hold of
the IT world 13 years after we first discerned it. Leonardo da Vinci
would be pleased.
Happy bargain
hunting!
Bob
Djurdjevic
Click
here for PDF (print) version
For additional Annex Research reports, check out... Annex
Bulletin Index 2007 (including all prior years' indexes)

Or just click on SEARCH and use "company or topic name" keywords.
Volume XXIII, Annex
Bulletin 2007-35
October 12, 2007
Bob Djurdjevic, Editor
(c) Copyright 2007 by Annex Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
e-mail: annex@djurdjevic.com
8183 E Mountain Spring Rd, Scottsdale, Arizona 85255
Tel/Fax: +1-602-824-8111
The copyright-protected information contained in the ANNEX BULLETINS is part of the Comprehensive Market Service (CMS).
It is intended for the exclusive use
by those who have contracted for the entire CMS service. |
Home |
Headlines | Annex Bulletins
| Index 1993-2007
| Special Reports | About Founder |
Search | Feedback
| Clips | Activism
| Client quotes | Speeches
| Columns
| Subscribe |
Also
check out...
Profitable Growth
Continues
- Analysis of HP's 3Q business results
[Annex clients click
here]
zAAP-ed by
IBM! (Analysis:
Mainframe demand benefiting from specialty engines, Java)
Profitable Growth
Continues
- Analysis of HP's 3Q business results
[Annex clients click
here]
Sun's Solaris to
Shine on IBM's Polaris (IBM
to offer Suns OS on its hardware) The Greening
of Big Blue, Part 2 (IBM
to save $250M in mainframe consolidation)
IBM Beats the
Street (Analysis
of IBM 2Q07 business results)
Adios, Microsoft
Vista! (How
I Failed Twice in Trying to Scale Mt. Vista)
Burning the Track
- Firing on all cylinders, Accenture raises forecast
[Annex clients click
here]
New Broom Sweeps
Clean - Analysis of CSC's 4Q07 business results
[Annex clients click
here]
The
Last of the (PC) Mohicans - Analysis of Dell's strategy changes;
Linux, Wal-Mart
BRIC
by BRIC... to Top Line Growth -
Echoes
from IBM meeting for fin analysts
[Annex clients click
here]
Per Ardua Ad Astra
-
Analysis of HP's 2Q07 business results
[Annex clients click
here]
The
Greening of Big Blue (IBM
to spend $1 billion on "going green")
Are We in
"Buyback Bubble?" - Analysis of corporate stock buyback
trends
IBM:
Lowering Center of Gravity (Highlights
of Partnerworld 2007, with Detailed
Reports for Clients)
Growth
Accelerating - Analysis of Capgemini's 1Q07 business results
[Annex clients click
here]
To
Buy (back shares) or Not to Buy? - Analysis of stock buybacks in
corporate America
No Surprises in
Good Opening Quarter - Analysis of IBM 1Q business results
[Annex
clients click her
IBM
Stock Still Grossly Undervalued (A preview of IBM first
quarter business results]
Accenture
Beats Forecasts, Again (Analysis of Accenture's 2QFY07 results)
HPS,
Capgemini Tie for "Gold" - Results of Octathlon 2007
[Annex
clients click here]
The Value of pi (π)
- Analysis of IBM System p and System i market and product strategies
IBM
Profit to Grow Faster Than Revenue - Update to 5-yr IBM
forecast [Annex
clients click here]
The
(T)ides of March Sink Markets Again - Analysis of
global economic & investment trends
IGS:
Growth Slows, Profit Surges - Analysis of IGS 2006 business results
[Annex
clients click here]
HP:
Toward New Highs? (Excerpts from analysis of
HP's 1Q07 business results) [Annex
clients click here]
Capgemini
Caps Great Year, Saves Best for Last (Analysis of Capgemini's
fourth quarter business results)
EDS: On Sunny Side of Street
(Analysis
of EDS' fourth quarter business results)
CSC:
Where Less Seems More (Analysis
of CSC's third quarter fiscal 2007 business results)
Fujitsu:
Sales Up, Profit Down (Analysis
of Fujitsu's third quarter fiscal 2007 business results)
IBM
Shatters Records (Analysis
of IBM's fourth quarter business results)
IBM
Stock Passes Century Mark
(Analysis
of Big Blue's Stock Performance)
Happy
Days Are Here Again
(Analysis
of Top 20 IT leaders' latest stock market
and business performances)
"Excellenture"
Excels Again
(Analysis of Accenture's first quarter fiscal
2007 business results) [Annex
clients click here]
Hedging
the Bets
(Analysis of latest institutional shareholdings of
leading IT companies: IBM, HP, Accenture, EDS, CSC, BearingPoint, ACS,
Perot ) [Annex
clients click here]
Globalization
Accelerates
(Analysis of
United Nation's annual survey of global investments)
IBM:
A $125-Stock?
(An update to "From Small Acorns
Mighty Oaks Grow")
Capgemini:
Longest Sustained Stock Price Rise
(An update to
"By Leaps and Bounds")
HP:
New King of the Hill
(Analysis
of HP's fourth quarter business results)
IBM:
From Little Acorns Mighty Oaks Grow
(Analysis
of IBM's "State of the Union")
Capgemini:
By Leaps and Bounds
(Analysis
of Capgemini's preliminary third quarter business results)
Fujitsu:
Good Performance Gets Better, More Global
(Analysis
of Fujitsu's first half FY2007 business results)
IBM:
A Slam Dunk Quarter
(Analysis
of IBM third quarter business results)
Accenture's
Emphatic Year-end Accents
(Analysis of Accenture's
fourth quarter results) [Annex
clients click here]
IBM:
Services in a Box
(Analysis
of IBM Global Services' Ground-shifting Announcements)
Strong
Comeback by IT Stocks in Third Quarter
(Analysis
of top 20 IT companies' market and business trends)
Stock
Buybacks: A Fading Fad
(Dell,
erstwhile "King of Fluff," suspends its stock buybacks)
Capgemini:
Growth Continues
(Revenues,
net profit up in double digits, margins also improve)
HP
Firing on All Cylinders
(Stock sets new multi-year
record following excellent third fiscal quarter results) [Annex clients click
here]
Power
of Manpower
(While
others move to India, Russia... AMD
invests in New York, hailing "phenomenal" quality of its
labor force)
Ebb
Tide Lowers Most Boats
(Analysis
of EDS' and CSC's latest quarterly results)
IBM
Stock Grossly Undervalued?
(Analysis
of stock market valuations of IBM and its major competitors) [adds
latest Fujitsu, Capgemini results]
IBM
vs. HP: A Tale of Two Blues (Both
companies are doing well in business, but only HP is favored by Wall
Street; Big Blue trying to change that now with its new "India
Opus") [Annex
clients click here]
Go
East, Young Man! (A
speech delivered in St. Petersburg, Russia, May 25, 2006; click
here for slides)
IBM
5-Yr Forecast: Steady As She Goes
(Emphasis on quality
continued) [Annex
clients click here]
Octathlon
2006: Accenture Again Wins "Gold!"
(HP gets
"Silver," IBM "bronze") [Annex
clients click here]
|